Search for: All records

Abstract An ensemble postprocessing method is developed for the probabilistic prediction of severe weather (tornadoes, hail, and wind gusts) over the conterminous United States (CONUS). The method combines conditional generative adversarial networks (CGANs), a type of deep generative model, with a convolutional neural network (CNN) to postprocess convection-allowing model (CAM) forecasts. The CGANs are designed to create synthetic ensemble members from deterministic CAM forecasts, and their outputs are processed by the CNN to estimate the probability of severe weather. The method is tested using High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) 1–24-h forecasts as inputs and Storm Prediction Center (SPC) severe weather reports as targets. The method produced skillful predictions with up to 20% Brier skill score (BSS) increases compared to other neural-network-based reference methods using a testing dataset of HRRR forecasts in 2021. For the evaluation of uncertainty quantification, the method is overconfident but produces meaningful ensemble spreads that can distinguish good and bad forecasts. The quality of CGAN outputs is also evaluated. Results show that the CGAN outputs behave similarly to a numerical ensemble; they preserved the intervariable correlations and the contribution of influential predictors as in the original HRRR forecasts. This work provides a novel approach to postprocess CAM output using neural networks that can be applied to severe weather prediction. Significance StatementWe use a new machine learning (ML) technique to generate probabilistic forecasts of convective weather hazards, such as tornadoes and hailstorms, with the output from high-resolution numerical weather model forecasts. The new ML system generates an ensemble of synthetic forecast fields from a single forecast, which are then used to train ML models for convective hazard prediction. Using this ML-generated ensemble for training leads to improvements of 10%–20% in severe weather forecast skills compared to using other ML algorithms that use only output from the single forecast. This work is unique in that it explores the use of ML methods for producing synthetic forecasts of convective storm events and using these to train ML systems for high-impact convective weather prediction. 

Abstract As artificial intelligence (AI) methods are increasingly used to develop new guidance intended for operational use by forecasters, it is critical to evaluate whether forecasters deem the guidance trustworthy. Past trust-related AI research suggests that certain attributes (e.g., understanding how the AI was trained, interactivity, and performance) contribute to users perceiving the AI as trustworthy. However, little research has been done to examine the role of these and other attributes for weather forecasters. In this study, we conducted 16 online interviews with National Weather Service (NWS) forecasters to examine (i) how they make guidance use decisions and (ii) how the AI model technique used, training, input variables, performance, and developers as well as interacting with the model output influenced their assessments of trustworthiness of new guidance. The interviews pertained to either a random forest model predicting the probability of severe hail or a 2D convolutional neural network model predicting the probability of storm mode. When taken as a whole, our findings illustrate how forecasters’ assessment of AI guidance trustworthiness is a process that occurs over time rather than automatically or at first introduction. We recommend developers center end users when creating new AI guidance tools, making end users integral to their thinking and efforts. This approach is essential for the development of useful andusedtools. The details of these findings can help AI developers understand how forecasters perceive AI guidance and inform AI development and refinement efforts. Significance StatementWe used a mixed-methods quantitative and qualitative approach to understand how National Weather Service (NWS) forecasters 1) make guidance use decisions within their operational forecasting process and 2) assess the trustworthiness of prototype guidance developed using artificial intelligence (AI). When taken as a whole, our findings illustrate that forecasters’ assessment of AI guidance trustworthiness is a process that occurs over time rather than automatically and suggest that developers must center the end user when creating new AI guidance tools to ensure that the developed tools are useful andused.